ok, thats all for today..

Please Only Post Links To Pictures
Post Reply
User avatar
inquisitor_uk
Special Member
Special Member
Posts: 388
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 12:20 am

ok, thats all for today..

Post by inquisitor_uk »

Dafreak
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
Posts: 268
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 1:43 am

Post by Dafreak »

I'm still trying to figure out how someone can go from amateur to professional pisser. Does it step up through apprentice to journeyman(woman) on through master pisser? Is it based on number and diversion of techniques? Inquiring minds want to know!
"If it is to be it is up to me"

10 two letter words, nine spaces, and a credo to live by!
User avatar
inquisitor_uk
Special Member
Special Member
Posts: 388
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 12:20 am

Post by inquisitor_uk »

I think there is a college course... ;)

or you have to take an apprentaship..
User avatar
mpp
Good Poster
Good Poster
Posts: 790
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 6:13 am
Location: Pee.Q.
Contact:

Post by mpp »

You gotta enroll you in a degree at the Faculty of Urolagnia or stick a lot in the local college pub. :)
User avatar
Kizzie
Special Member
Special Member
Posts: 2025
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 6:21 pm

Post by Kizzie »

Dafreak - there's an entire string on this way back when. I asked if being an "amateur" pisser just meant that one did not get paid for it like the "professionals" - or whether "amateurs" are just crap at it?

I was put straight by learned board members, who said it was more a question of whether the shot was posed and/or composed, or just natural. So it appears the "amateur" or "professional" ephitet applies every bit as much to the photographer. So -

Posed + good shot + pretty girl = Pro.

Natural + lower quality shot + any old hound = Amateur.

I'm ok with that - it kind of knocks sense into a bizarre concept for me!
User avatar
Xiens
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
Posts: 210
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 10:28 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by Xiens »

Kizzie wrote: Posed + good shot + pretty girl = Pro.
Natural + lower quality shot + any old hound = Amateur.
That's because these features would show to what extent these people are familiar with professional pornography techniques :roll:
Amateurs often try very hard to get a professional look, so they could even found to pose even more, whereas some good professional photographer might give an excellent suggestion of a candid picture :wink:
MrPeex
Special Member
Special Member
Posts: 72
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2004 7:05 am
Location: Sweden

Post by MrPeex »

Not very hard is it?

If you get money for your effort you are no longer an amateur... This means that 99% of the pictures out there are depicting Pros...
User avatar
Xiens
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
Posts: 210
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 10:28 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by Xiens »

MrPeex wrote:Not very hard is it?

If you get money for your effort you are no longer an amateur... This means that 99% of the pictures out there are depicting Pros...
On the other hand, how would you know that they didn't get money for it, or some other form of reward, like good sex. I think an amateur watersports picture requires a combination of pissing and exhibitionism :D
Dafreak
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
Posts: 268
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 1:43 am

Post by Dafreak »

Well all thanks for the insights. Kizie...I forgot about your post. Sorry. I think I'll stick with the amateurs as they are the sexiest, though maybe not the most blatant.
"If it is to be it is up to me"

10 two letter words, nine spaces, and a credo to live by!
Post Reply